ArticleMolecular diagnosis & therapy2026
Development of Diagnostic Models and Biomarker Identification for Type 1 Leptomeningeal Metastasis in Lung Adenocarcinoma Using Olink: Exploratory Cohort Study with Internal Temporal Validation.
Article in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo enable early identification of type 1 leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) risk and to identify plasma- and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-based biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).
methodsBlood and CSF samples were prospectively obtained from patients with advanced LUAD with or without LM. A total of 174 samples were analyzed using the Olink
resultsIn total, 88 blood samples and 86 CSF samples were obtained. Seven representative plasma proteins were consistently selected, forming a plasma protein diagnostic model with the area under the curve (AUC, p-training set) of 0.918, a sensitivity of 100%, and a specificity of 73.0%; the AUC in the p-test set was 0.765. A total of 12 representative CSF proteins were selected to establish a CSF protein diagnostic model with an AUC (c-training set) of 0.984, a sensitivity of 96.7%, and a specificity of 96.7%; the AUC in the c-test set was 0.944. In CSF samples, 65 differentially expressed proteins were identified between the LM and nLM groups, and enrichment analysis indicated predominant clustering within inflammatory and immune activation pathways. In addition, tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 9 (TNFRSF9) alone yielded an AUC of 0.960 for discriminating the LM group from the nLM_nBM (brain metastasis) group.
conclusionsA diagnostic model for type 1 LUAD-LM was developed with high accuracy and potential clinical applicability. Moreover, CSF-specific biomarkers have been identified, offering potential candidate targets for the management of LUAD-LM.
Identifiers
42804151What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.