Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42804151›Full record

ArticleMolecular diagnosis & therapy2026

Development of Diagnostic Models and Biomarker Identification for Type 1 Leptomeningeal Metastasis in Lung Adenocarcinoma Using Olink: Exploratory Cohort Study with Internal Temporal Validation.

Peng Ding, Qiuchi Chen, Yun Li, Yulan Kui, Zhi Wang, Hongxia Zhou, Bohua Kuang, Lingjuan Chen, Xing Zhang, Minghui Ge and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Peng Ding *Cancer Center, Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430022, China.
Qiuchi Chen *Cancer Center, Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430022, China.
Yun Li *Cancer Center, Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430022, China.
Yulan KuiCancer Center, Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430022, China.
Zhi WangCancer Center, Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430022, China.
Hongxia ZhouCancer Center, Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430022, China.
Bohua KuangCancer Center, Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430022, China.
Lingjuan ChenCancer Center, Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430022, China.
Xing ZhangState Key Laboratory of Neurology and Oncology Drug Development, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd., Nanjing Simcere Medical Laboratory Science Co., Ltd., Nanjing, 210023, China.
Minghui GeState Key Laboratory of Neurology and Oncology Drug Development, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd., Nanjing Simcere Medical Laboratory Science Co., Ltd., Nanjing, 210023, China.
Tiantian HanState Key Laboratory of Neurology and Oncology Drug Development, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd., Nanjing Simcere Medical Laboratory Science Co., Ltd., Nanjing, 210023, China.
Ruiguang ZhangCancer Center, Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430022, China. zrg27@163.com.
Fan TongCancer Center, Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430022, China. tongfan@hust.edu.cn.
Xiaorong DongCancer Center, Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430022, China. xiaorongdong@hust.edu.cn.

Funding

Opening Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Neurology and Oncology Drug Development SKLSIM-20251426Open Research Fund of Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology jzfs009Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China 2023M741281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo enable early identification of type 1 leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) risk and to identify plasma- and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-based biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).

methodsBlood and CSF samples were prospectively obtained from patients with advanced LUAD with or without LM. A total of 174 samples were analyzed using the Olink

resultsIn total, 88 blood samples and 86 CSF samples were obtained. Seven representative plasma proteins were consistently selected, forming a plasma protein diagnostic model with the area under the curve (AUC, p-training set) of 0.918, a sensitivity of 100%, and a specificity of 73.0%; the AUC in the p-test set was 0.765. A total of 12 representative CSF proteins were selected to establish a CSF protein diagnostic model with an AUC (c-training set) of 0.984, a sensitivity of 96.7%, and a specificity of 96.7%; the AUC in the c-test set was 0.944. In CSF samples, 65 differentially expressed proteins were identified between the LM and nLM groups, and enrichment analysis indicated predominant clustering within inflammatory and immune activation pathways. In addition, tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 9 (TNFRSF9) alone yielded an AUC of 0.960 for discriminating the LM group from the nLM_nBM (brain metastasis) group.

conclusionsA diagnostic model for type 1 LUAD-LM was developed with high accuracy and potential clinical applicability. Moreover, CSF-specific biomarkers have been identified, offering potential candidate targets for the management of LUAD-LM.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.