Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42804121›Full record

ReviewJournal of prevention (2022)2026

Attitudes, Psychological Processes and Evaluation Methodologies of Electronic Cigarette Advertising: A Systematic Review.

Marcela Velasco Salamanca, María Idaly Barreto Galeano, Juan Camilo Carvajal Builes, Luis Mario Castellanos Alvarenga

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of prevention (2022), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marcela Velasco SalamancaUniversidad Católica de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia. rmvelasco@ucatolica.edu.co.
María Idaly Barreto GaleanoUniversidad Católica de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Juan Camilo Carvajal BuilesUniversidad Católica de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Luis Mario Castellanos AlvarengaEscuela de Psicología, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Educación, Universidad Santo Tomás, Temuco, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aggressive proliferation of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) advertising represents a critical global public health concern, particularly due to its capacity to induce nicotine dependence in youth. This systematic review aimed to describe the specific attitudes and psychological processes (cognition and emotion) elicited by ENDS advertising, alongside identifying the current methodologies implemented for their evaluation. Primary empirical studies published between 2015 and July 2026 were systematically reviewed following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The final corpus comprised twelve ([Formula: see text]) studies incorporating quantitative and mixed methods designs focused on young populations exposed to ENDS advertising. Searches were conducted across Scopus, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, EBSCOhost, and the Ministry of Health Digital Library, restricting eligibility to English and Spanish reports. Findings show that ENDS advertising employs visual, linguistic, and emotional persuasion strategies across the twelve included studies, demonstrating a dominance of quantitative approaches and an expansion toward randomized experimental designs (50.0%). Methodological quality appraisal reached an overall global compliance score of 93.9%. While earlier studies lacked explicit reporting on risk of bias, 33.3% of the corpus rigorously implemented method-level bias controls, including stimulus counterbalancing and objective biochemical verification via salivary cotinine. Messages evoking positive emotions (e.g., freedom, social belonging) and minimizing perceived risk foster favorable attitudes and consumption intentions by manipulating affective precursors while leaving cognitive harm calculations unchanged. Major gaps include an integration deficit between implicit and explicit attitudinal measures, as well as a historical shortage of longitudinal tracking. Despite these limitations, current evidence provides a robust empirical baseline for prevention practice, guiding the development of targeted public health counter-advertising campaigns and stricter structural regulations on product marketing features.

Indexed as

AdvertisingCognitionElectronic cigaretteEmotionsLanguagePrevention

Identifiers

PMID42804121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.