ReviewJournal of prevention (2022)2026
Attitudes, Psychological Processes and Evaluation Methodologies of Electronic Cigarette Advertising: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of prevention (2022), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aggressive proliferation of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) advertising represents a critical global public health concern, particularly due to its capacity to induce nicotine dependence in youth. This systematic review aimed to describe the specific attitudes and psychological processes (cognition and emotion) elicited by ENDS advertising, alongside identifying the current methodologies implemented for their evaluation. Primary empirical studies published between 2015 and July 2026 were systematically reviewed following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The final corpus comprised twelve ([Formula: see text]) studies incorporating quantitative and mixed methods designs focused on young populations exposed to ENDS advertising. Searches were conducted across Scopus, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, EBSCOhost, and the Ministry of Health Digital Library, restricting eligibility to English and Spanish reports. Findings show that ENDS advertising employs visual, linguistic, and emotional persuasion strategies across the twelve included studies, demonstrating a dominance of quantitative approaches and an expansion toward randomized experimental designs (50.0%). Methodological quality appraisal reached an overall global compliance score of 93.9%. While earlier studies lacked explicit reporting on risk of bias, 33.3% of the corpus rigorously implemented method-level bias controls, including stimulus counterbalancing and objective biochemical verification via salivary cotinine. Messages evoking positive emotions (e.g., freedom, social belonging) and minimizing perceived risk foster favorable attitudes and consumption intentions by manipulating affective precursors while leaving cognitive harm calculations unchanged. Major gaps include an integration deficit between implicit and explicit attitudinal measures, as well as a historical shortage of longitudinal tracking. Despite these limitations, current evidence provides a robust empirical baseline for prevention practice, guiding the development of targeted public health counter-advertising campaigns and stricter structural regulations on product marketing features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42804121What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.