ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Personalized respiratory guidance strategy via millimeter-wave radar-based breathing consistency score.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Key respiratory parameters such as inhalation-to-exhalation ratio and phase durations are known to influence physiological outcomes. However, most existing respiratory guidance systems rely on frequency-driven instructions, do not evaluate whether the user's breathing follows the intended waveform, and depend on contact sensors that can cause discomfort during prolonged use. To address these limitations, we propose a millimeter-wave radar-based personalized guidance strategy driven by real-time respiratory consistency feedback. Resting and 4-7-8 breathing signals from 20 participants were used to construct individualized progressive guidance curves via a sinusoidal-based segmented motion model fitted by the Grey Wolf Optimizer. A segmented dynamic time warping algorithm with duration-deviation penalty was developed to compute the Breathing Consistency Score (BCS) as a real-time feedback signal. A controlled crossover experiment compared BCS-driven guidance against frequency-driven guidance in terms of guidance efficiency, waveform-following consistency, and stress reduction, with subjective comfort additionally assessed through open-ended feedback. BCS-driven guidance significantly improved waveform-following consistency, reduced target acquisition time, and achieved greater stress reduction. Most participants also reported greater comfort. This real-time consistency feedback solution can help individuals with stress-related conditions such as anxiety disorders or post‑traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) better utilize respiratory guidance for stress regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42804120What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.