ReviewInsights into imaging2026
Hepatobiliary phase imaging in HCC: revisiting diagnostic algorithms and clinical utility of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI across international guidelines.
Review in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. In at-risk populations, noninvasive imaging diagnosis relies primarily on the vascular hallmarks of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout appearance. However, these features are often absent in early hepatocarcinogenesis, thereby limiting timely detection. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI has expanded the role of imaging in HCC, yet its clinical value is often oversimplified as a comparison of diagnostic performance with CT or extracellular contrast MRI. A critical issue is that the same imaging feature, particularly hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointensity, carries different diagnostic consequences across international frameworks. Because HBP signal loss reflects early hepatocellular dysfunction that may precede typical vascular hallmarks, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI provides a biologically driven sensitivity advantage for detecting small and early-stage HCC. However, its apparent performance varies largely according to diagnostic intent: sensitivity-oriented Asian guidelines incorporate HBP hypointensity as a major feature to enable earlier detection, whereas Western guidelines prioritize specificity in high-stakes decision contexts, such as liver transplantation, and therefore restrict its diagnostic weight. This intent-dependent interpretation explains much of the inconsistency reported in the literature and underscores the limitations of pooled, guideline-agnostic performance estimates. Beyond diagnosis, HBP imaging also offers complementary information for assessing treatment response, although it remains underutilized in current criteria. Overall, the clinical value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI lies not in universal superiority but in context-aligned application, shifting the focus from modality comparison to optimization according to downstream clinical consequences. KEY POINTS: Question Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is interpreted differently across international hepatocellular carcinoma diagnostic guidelines, resulting in uncertainty regarding optimal imaging criteria and clinical decision-making. Findings Hepatobiliary phase hypointensity reflects early hepatocellular dysfunction and improves sensitivity for small and early-stage HCC, but its impact varies according to diagnostic intent. Critical Relevance Statement An intent-aligned interpretation strategy may help reconcile guideline heterogeneity and optimize the use of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, particularly in the evaluation of small HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.