ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2026
Hybrid attention and MLP-based deep learning for MRI classification of lumbar spine degeneration.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lumbar spine degeneration (LSD) is a major contributor to lower back pain (LBP) worldwide, typically diagnosed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Manual interpretation of MRI scans is time-consuming and prone to variability, creating an urgent need for automated solutions. This study introduces a deep learning (DL) framework for classifying three key degenerative conditions, neural foraminal narrowing, subarticular stenosis, and spinal canal stenosis, across five lumbar disc levels. We evaluated multiple architectures, including VGG-16, EfficientNetV2-S, and YOLOv5, and enhanced feature extraction using the Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM) while improving classification through a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). The dataset comprises 48,657 multi-centre MRI images and was partitioned using a stratified 80:20 training-testing split. Class imbalance was addressed using Random Oversampling (ROS), Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE), and Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)-based augmentation. Model development incorporated validation monitoring and early stopping during training, while final performance was assessed on an independent testing set using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, confusion matrices, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The proposed hybrid model, VGG‑16+CBAM+MLP, achieved 94% accuracy, with precision, recall, and F1‑score exceeding 91%. Paired statistical tests confirmed these improvements were significant (p < 0.05), reinforcing the robustness of the approach. These results demonstrate the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven tools to support lumbar spine MRI assessment. Further external validation is required before clinical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42804058What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.