ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2026
Atherosclerosis diagnosis from magnetic resonance images: an empirical approach to automate carotid vessel wall segmentation and feature-based prediction.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carotid artery atherosclerosis is a severe vascular condition linked to stroke and cardiovascular complications, requiring early and precise diagnosis. Manual segmentation of carotid artery structures in MRI is time-consuming and prone to interobserver variability. This study proposes and validates an automated framework combining deep learning (DL)-based segmentation with machine learning (ML) classification for diagnosing carotid atherosclerosis from low-resolution MRI VISTA images. We used 30 patient cases from the COSMOS 2022 MICCAI dataset, comprising 3238 annotated 2D axial slices from 3D scans. A subject-independent five-fold cross-validation strategy was employed, with 647 test images per fold. Data imbalance was addressed using augmentation and class balancing. All scans were acquired using a 3T Philips MRI system with a 3D VISTA black-blood sequence (TR = 800 ms, TE = 20 ms, resolution = 0.6 × 0.6 × 0.6 mm³). Expert-guided annotations were performed by trained researchers. A DenseNet121-UNet++-based model, enhanced through ablation-driven improvements, was used for segmentation, evaluated using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and Intersection over Union (IoU). The proposed method achieved a DSC of 85.76% and IoU of 73.68%. For classification, 466 handcrafted features were extracted and ranked using XGBoost, Random Forest, and Extra Trees, followed by stacking ensemble learning. The classification accuracy improved to 86.94%, outperforming individual models. The results demonstrate that improved segmentation significantly enhances classification performance. The proposed hybrid DL-ML pipeline provides an accurate, interpretable, and clinically feasible solution for automated carotid atherosclerosis diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42804057What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.