ArticleEJNMMI physics2026
Evaluation of a lead-loaded plastic scintillator for next-generation positron emission tomography detectors using Geant4 simulation.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLead-loaded plastic scintillators are promising candidates for next-generation positron emission tomography (PET) detectors owing to their short fluorescence decay times, high machinability and low production cost. However, their γ-ray detection performance has not been fully quantified. This study evaluated the detection efficiency and energy-resolution characteristics of a 5 wt% lead-loaded plastic scintillator (EJ-256) and compared its performance with that of a conventional polyvinyltoluene (PVT) scintillator.
methodsMonte Carlo simulations were performed using Geant4. Monoenergetic 511 keV gamma rays (100 000 events) were irradiated onto scintillator blocks with thicknesses varied from 20 mm to 200 mm in 5 mm increments. The resulting absorbed-energy spectra were analysed using ROOT to determine detection efficiency and the simulated full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the 511-keV photopeak. To identify the thickness region at which detection efficiency saturated, a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was conducted to consecutive thickness groups to determine the point beyond which differences were no longer statistically significant (p > 0.05).
resultsEJ-256 exhibited a distinct 511 keV photopeak, whereas PVT showed only a broad Compton continuum. The detection efficiency increased from 0.9% at 20 mm to 2.9% at 200 mm and saturated above approximately 135 mm, consistent with the Kruskal-Wallis analysis. The simulated 511-keV photopeak width remained stable at approximately 10% FWHM across all thicknesses.
conclusionThese results indicate that EJ-256 demonstrates photon-absorption performance comparable to that of conventional inorganic PET scintillators, while offering substantially faster temporal response and reduced fabrication cost. This combination suggests strong potential for application in future time-of-flight PET detector modules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.