SynthesisTropical animal health and production2026
Global prevalence of Anaplasma species infection in domestic small ruminants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anaplasma species are obligate intracellular pathogens primarily transmitted by ticks, posing significant threats to livestock health and economic stability worldwide. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the global infection burden of Anaplasma spp. in domestic small ruminants. Three electronic databases were systematically searched for literature published up to 2023, yielding 52 eligible cross-sectional studies evaluating 6,112 goats (31 studies) and 6,671 sheep (40 studies). To prevent diagnostic confounding, datasets were stratified by methodology into serological and molecular (PCR) investigations. In goats, the stratified pooled estimates were 43% for serology and 44% for PCR, demonstrating highly comparable detection frequencies, with macro-geographical trends peaking in Africa (52%), followed by Europe (41%) and Asia (34%). In sheep, serological assays yielded a pooled estimate of 50%, while PCR testing produced a consistent baseline of 46%. A. ovis emerged as the predominant species in both goats (41%) and sheep (45%), whereas the lowest baseline frequencies involved A. capra in goats (19%) and Anaplasma platys in sheep (10%). Exploratory seasonal trends indicated elevated detection rates during warmer months, peaking during autumn for goats (24%) and summer for sheep (26%). However, extreme between-study heterogeneity ([Formula: see text]) persisted across all subgroups, confirming that these pooled estimates represent approximate literature averages influenced by localized variables rather than precise global benchmarks. These insights underscore the necessity for standardized, multi-element One Health surveillance systems to effectively manage tick-borne pathogens in small ruminants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42804035What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.