ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Public information-seeking about orthopedic surgical robotics: a decade-scale infodemiological analysis and forecast through 2030.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Public information-seeking is an underused indicator of the diffusion of robotic-assisted surgery, yet no study has compared it jointly across the three highest-volume orthopedic domains or projected it toward the coming decade. Using Google Trends relative search volume (RSV: a term's share of all searches in a given month, rescaled 0-100 against the highest month of the study window, and not a count of searches) retrieved programmatically (Health category, worldwide, January 2014-June 2026; 150 monthly observations per term), we quantified and forecast public search interest in robotic knee, hip, and spine surgery. Mann-Kendall and Theil-Sen statistics confirmed significant monotonic growth in all three domains (P < 0.001). Knee interest rose from a mean RSV of 3.0 to 77.0 and hip interest emerged from below the reporting threshold to 15.1, while spine interest rose from a censored baseline to 18.8 and showed the steepest recent monthly growth of the three domains (3.7% versus 2.5% for knee and 2.2% for hip) over the final three years; because the hip and spine baselines lay at or below the platform's censoring threshold, fold-changes are baseline-dependent and are not used here as primary effect measures. Seasonal decomposition revealed consistent February and early-summer peaks and December troughs across all domains. Seasonal ARIMA models, selected by Akaike information criterion, project further three- to four-fold increases in arthroplasty-domain interest by 2030 (knee approximately 283; hip approximately 49), while spine forecasts remained conservative (approximately 21) owing to early censoring, with sensitivity analyses suggesting a plausible range up to approximately 112. Lay terminology outnumbered technical terminology roughly 10:1, though technical-term searching has recently accelerated; aggregate search data cannot identify who issues a query, so this shift is not attributed to any particular group of searchers. These findings indicate that English-language public search interest in robotic orthopedic surgery is rising rapidly and most steeply for spine surgery, and that infodemiological signals, being transparent, freely available, and continuously updated, can complement clinical evidence and institutional capacity metrics to inform technology investment, patient counseling, and research prioritization through 2030. Search interest reflects information-seeking behavior; its conversion into clinical demand was not measured and should not be assumed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42804031What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.