Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42804013›Full record

ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2026

Hypersensitivity Reactions to Biologics: Advances in Diagnosis and Management.

Barbara C Yang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Barbara C YangDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 60 Fenwood Road, Hale Building for Transformative Medicine, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. bcyang@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5018-095X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe landscape of biologic therapeutics has expanded to include therapies such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and bispecific T-cell engagers. As the use of these therapies expands, hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) can limit the use of preferred treatments. This review examines advances in the diagnosis and management of these adverse events, including applications of precision medicine and AllergoOncology. RECENT

findingsRecent studies have identified hereditary alpha tryptasemia (HαT) and female sex as potential risk factors for biologic-induced anaphylaxis. Excipients such as PEG and polysorbates are increasingly recognized as potential triggers of first-exposure reactions. The basophil activation test (BAT) has emerged as a complementary tool for evaluating IgE-mediated hypersensitivity and differentiating it from cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Recent approaches to rapid drug desensitization (RDD) include one-bag protocols, same-day desensitization, and omalizumab as an adjunct in selected patients. The approach to biologic hypersensitivity is increasingly guided by reaction phenotype, diagnostic evaluation, and individualized management.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsDesensitization, ImmunologicDrug HypersensitivityAnaphylaxisFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin EOmalizumabBiological ProductsImmunoglobulin EOmalizumabAllergoOncologyBiologicDesensitizationHypersensitivityMonoclonal antibodiesPhenotyping

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.