ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
Phytochemicals modulating TGF-β signaling in radiation-induced fibrosis.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) is a central mediator of the pathogenesis of radiation-induced tissue injury, contributing to processes such as chronic inflammation, fibrosis, and immunosuppression. This review addresses the therapeutic potential of phytochemicals (bioactive plant-derived compounds) as potential agents to target and modulate TGF-β-mediated radiation-induced damage. A diverse group of phytochemicals, including curcumin, resveratrol, epigallocatechin gallate, quercetin, berberine, honokiol, and silibinin, exhibit potential multi-target effects on this pathway. Their reported effects are associated with modulation of Smad2/3 phosphorylation and nuclear translocation, and may involve regulation of TGF-β receptor expression and modulation of downstream non-canonical pathways such as MAPK and PI3K/Akt. Collectively, these actions may attenuate key pathological processes, including fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, excessive extracellular matrix deposition, and oxidative stress. Preclinical evidence from in vitro and in vivo models suggests that these compounds may reduce fibrosis and inflammation markers, such as collagen, α-SMA, and TGF-β1 itself; however, the majority of mechanistic evidence derives from non‑radiation fibrosis models (e.g., bleomycin, CCl₄, silica) and requires direct validation in radiation‑specific settings. Early-stage clinical trials, mostly small-scale and uncontrolled, have reported preliminary signals of reduced severity of radiation dermatitis and mucositis; however, these findings require confirmation in larger, well-designed trials. By modulating the profibrotic TGF-β axis, these compounds may represent potential supportive strategies for limiting radiation-induced normal-tissue injury; however, their clinical benefit, safety, and effects on tumor control remain to be established in adequately powered clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42804009What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.