Observational studyJournal of robotic surgery2026
Medical students' perceptions and curriculum preferences for robotic surgery in Oman: a cross-sectional study.
Observational study in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic surgery is an advanced form of minimally invasive surgery, and its use has continued to grow worldwide. Despite this, undergraduate medical education has not expanded at the same rate, and formal exposure to robotic surgery remains limited in many settings, including Oman. A structured educational needs assessment is an important first step in curriculum development. Understanding medical students' perceived knowledge, attitudes, and preferred learning approaches can help guide the introduction of robotic surgery into undergraduate and postgraduate training. This study therefore aimed to assess medical students' perceived knowledge, attitudes, and curriculum preferences regarding robotic surgery in medical training in Oman. This cross-sectional observational study used a validated questionnaire adapted from a published robotic-surgery study and distributed electronically to medical students at Sultan Qaboos University (SQU). It was used as a local educational needs-assessment tool to examine students' perceived knowledge, attitudes, and preferred learning approaches regarding robotic surgery. Convenience sampling was used. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26.0, and P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 519 medical students were included in the study. Although 71.5% had heard of robotic surgery, 87.3% felt that their knowledge of the field was insufficient. Greater precision was identified most often as an advantage (67.2%), whereas higher cost was the most frequently reported disadvantage (82.3%). Some students remained hesitant about undergoing robotic surgery themselves. Despite this, support for incorporating robotic surgery into training was high, with 81.3% favouring its inclusion in the MD curriculum and 88.2% supporting its inclusion in residency training. Simulation-based teaching was the preferred learning method (73.5%), followed by attending robotic procedures during surgical rotations (66.5%). Most respondents also believed that Oman should invest in robotic surgery. Medical students in Oman generally had a positive view of robotic surgery, but self-perceived knowledge gaps and cost concerns remain. Robotic surgery education could therefore be introduced gradually, beginning with basic concepts, patient counselling, simulation-based learning, and supervised clinical exposure. These findings may help guide the curricular integration of this subject into undergraduate and postgraduate medical training in Oman.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.