ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2026
Assessment of the posterior pelvic ring during examination under anesthesia changes surgeons' classification and treatment decisions of anterior posterior compression pelvic ring injuries.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of the posterior pelvic ring during examination under anesthesia changes surgeons' classification and treatment decisions of anterior posterior compression pelvic ring injuries.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTraditionally, examination under anesthesia (EUA) focuses on displacement of the anterior pelvic ring and may fail to detect or localize sacroiliac (SI) joint diastasis in patients with anterior-posterior compression (APC) pelvic injuries. This study evaluates the effect of directly observing sacroiliac (SI) diastasis during EUA, compared to observing only the anterior pelvic ring (AP EUA), on changes in classification and treatment plan.
methodsFour hundred international pelvic surgeons were invited to participate in an online survey, with one month between two surveys. All surveys included the same 10 cases of APC injuries. One part included AP EUA images, and the other included additional SI EUA images. Questions regarding classification and treatment were asked, including the need for anterior and posterior fixation, and the side of SI joint fixation. The change in management after the addition of SI EUA images was assessed.
resultsOne hundred six pelvic trauma surgeons completed the survey with AP EUA images, and 99 also completed the survey with SI EUA images. The addition of SI EUA imaging resulted in a 37% change in classification, with APC1 decreasing from 17% with AP EUA to 10% with SI EUA, APC2 remaining 67%, and APC3 increasing from 17 to 23%. Treatment decisions changed in 29% of all cases. There was an increase in the combined anterior and posterior fixation, from 56 to 74%. Improved lateralization (choice of right or left SI joint fixation) was seen in 4 cases.
conclusionIn this survey, the addition of SI EUA images according to the modified protocol changed surgeons' perception of pelvic ring instability and the subsequent treatment strategy chosen. SI EUA images provide surgeons with information that prompts the addition of an SI joint fixation, resulting in an 18% increase in the use of combined anterior and posterior fixation. SI EUA images also improved injury localization, helping surgeons identify which sacroiliac joint required stabilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.