Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42803992›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2026

A stable tensorial approach for inversion of adsorption potential energy from isotherm data.

Márcio Oliveira Alves, Felipe Silva Carvalho, João Pedro Braga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Márcio Oliveira AlvesDepartamento de Química, Centro Federal de Tecnologia de Minas Gerais, Av. Amazonas 5253, Belo Horizonte, 30421-169, Minas Gerais, Brazil. marcioalves@cefetmg.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4995-0800
Felipe Silva Carvalho *Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, 91125, CA, USA.
João Pedro Braga *Departmento de Química, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Presidente Antônio Carlos 6627, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ- 02390-25
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextUnderlying the adsorption mechanism is not a simple task due to the complexity of the process. In this context, statistical mechanics provides a versatile approach with relatively low computational cost for describing adsorption phenomena. An alternative strategy consists of obtaining the adsorption potential energy from experimental data through the solution of an inverse problem. In this work, the adsorption potential energy was determined directly from adsorption isotherms using experimental datasets for both aqueous- and gas-phase adsorption systems. The proposed methodology was compared with the traditional two-step procedure, in which the second adsorption virial coefficient is first determined and subsequently used for inversion of the potential energy. Due to the ill-posed nature of the problem, the conventional approach exhibits significant instability and error propagation. In contrast, the direct inversion method provides excellent results, achieving values of

methodsA methodology grounded in statistical physics was developed to obtain the adsorption potential energy directly from isotherm data. The proposed approach formulates the problem as a tensor contraction, eliminating the need for the traditional two-step procedure involving the intermediate determination of the second adsorption virial coefficient.

Indexed as

AdsorptionInverse problemPotential energyTensorial contraction

Identifiers

PMID42803992
PMCPMC13619642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.