ReviewIntensive care medicine2026
Volatile anesthetic sedation in acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Review in Intensive care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) arises from a heterogenous set of inciting injuries and produces its classic sequelae of hypoxia and lung damage through multiple pathways. Over decades, therapeutic efforts have focused on targeting the inflammatory response and providing excellent supportive care. Volatile anesthetics have been proposed as agents that could achieve both of these aims by protecting against inflammatory lung injury, allowing effective sedation, and through respiratory effects including bronchodilation and maintenance of respiratory drive. Promising preliminary data demonstrated reductions in inflammatory mediators and improvements in oxygenation with volatile anesthetics for patients with ARDS. However, a recent multicenter randomized controlled trial found that sevoflurane sedation for patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS reduced ventilator free days at day 28 and increased mortality compared to propofol sedation. Ongoing and recently completed clinical trials may provide additional context for patients with respiratory failure including ARDS, although none are being conducted solely in ARDS patients. Priorities for future trials of volatile anesthetic sedation in ARDS include reconsideration of the dose, agent selection, and duration of volatile sedation, and potential heterogeneity of treatment effect across ARDS sub-phenotypes. Pending further high-quality data suggesting benefit, routine clinical use of volatile ICU sedation in ARDS is currently not recommended outside of clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42803955What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.