ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) following gender-affirming genital surgery: special anatomy, specific challenges].
Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) following gender-affirming genital surgery are an increasingly relevant challenge in urological practice. Although these symptoms largely correspond to well-known storage and voiding disorders, their underlying causes differ substantially from those encountered in the general population. Anatomical reconstruction after feminizing or masculinizing genital surgery results in characteristic functional alterations and procedure-specific complications that require tailored diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Following feminizing genital surgery, changes in urinary stream, meatal stenosis, and urinary tract infections are the most common urological issues. In contrast, after urethral lengthening, urethral strictures, urethrocutaneous fistulas, neourethral pseudodiverticula, and hair-related complications predominate. Distinguishing functional anatomical characteristics from clinically relevant complications is essential for appropriate patient management. Diagnostic evaluation generally follows established urological principles but must be adapted to the reconstructed anatomy. In particular, endoscopic examinations and transurethral instrumentation require careful consideration to avoid iatrogenic injury. This review provides a symptom-oriented overview of common LUTS following gender-affirming genital surgery and summarizes practical recommendations for diagnosis and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42803953What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.