Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42803935›Full record

ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026

Uncertainty-aware and interpretable deep learning in cytopathology: toward trustworthy AI-powered diagnostics.

Shahid Mehmood, Muzammil Hussain, Muhammad Adnan Khan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shahid MehmoodDepartment of Computer Science, Bahria University, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Muzammil HussainDepartment of Computer Science, University College of Duba, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, 47913, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad Adnan KhanDepartment of Software, Faculty of Artificial Intelligence and Software, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, 13557, Republic of Korea. adnan@gachon.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4854-9935

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning has shown remarkable success in cytopathology, particularly in cervical cancer screening and thyroid nodule classification. Yet, most models remain "black boxes," offering deterministic predictions without indicating uncertainty or explaining their reasoning, limiting clinical adoption. This review systematically examines uncertainty quantification (UQ) and explainable AI (XAI) techniques for trustworthy deep learning in cytology-the first to do so in this domain. We review state-of-the-art methods such as Bayesian neural networks, Monte Carlo dropout, and deep ensembles for uncertainty estimation, alongside Grad-CAM, attention mechanisms, and surrogate models for interpretability. Applications span cervical, thyroid, urinary, and hematological cytopathology. UQ methods help identify model limitations, flagging cases that need human review, while studies show improved accuracy for high-confidence predictions and better detection of misclassified cases. Visual explanation tools, especially Grad-CAM, highlight diagnostically relevant cellular features that align with pathologists' reasoning. Integrating UQ and XAI fosters effective human-AI collaboration, enabling systems to communicate both confidence levels and diagnostic rationale. This addresses the clinical trust gap, positioning AI as an assistive colleague rather than a black box, ultimately enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in cytopathology workflows.

Indexed as

Clinical decision supportCytopathologyDeep learningExplainable AIHuman-AI collaborationModel interpretabilityTrustworthy AIUncertainty quantification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.