ArticleNeurology and therapy2026
From Biomarker Anchors to Disease-State Transitions: A Biologically Anchored Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis Framework for Alzheimer's Disease Progression Modeling.
Article in Neurology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTo develop and validate a biomarker-anchored probabilistic principal component analysis (PPCA) framework for identifying biologically interpretable latent dimensions of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and evaluating their utility for disease progression modeling.
methodsData from 1058 participants that are amyloid-positive in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) were analyzed. Anchored PPCA used biomarker data only; cognitive, functional, diagnostic, and prognostic outcomes were withheld from latent-space construction and reserved for validation. Amyloid (A) and tau (T) factors were biologically anchored, neurodegeneration (N) was softly constrained, and a ventricular-vascular/residual (V/R) factor was empirically estimated. Robustness, reproducibility, held-out validity, clinical associations, prognostic performance, and clinical-state transitions were evaluated.
resultsAnchored PPCA identified four biologically coherent dimensions: A, T, N, and V/R. Solutions were reproducible across repeated initializations and split-half analyses, and generalized to held-out participants, particularly for A, T, and N. The model explained approximately 60% of model-implied standardized biomarker variance, with highest explained variance for A and T and lowest for V/R. Latent factors explained variance in outcomes not used for model construction: 49.7% for ADAS-Cog13, 35.1% for CDR-SB, and 27.8% for FAQ; they also aligned with diagnostic classifications. Cox-model C-indices were 0.843 for latent factors alone and 0.933 for clinical-plus-latent factors, with better fit than the clinical benchmark. T showed the strongest prognostic association, followed by A, N, and V/R. After adjustment for baseline clinical severity, A, T, and N remained independently prognostic; V/R did not. Clinical-state transitions were predominantly monotonic and demonstrated marked sojourn-time dependence.
conclusionBiomarker-only anchored PPCA provides a biologically grounded representation of AD that validates against cognition, function, diagnosis, and clinical progression. A, T, and N may capture disease processes not fully reflected in cross-sectional clinical severity, whereas V/R appears more closely related to contemporaneous clinical status. Duration-dependent transitions support semi-Markov disease-progression and Shared Latent Disease Process models. External validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42803910What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.