Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42803906›Full record

ReviewObesity surgery2026

Ultra-processed Food Consumption After Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: Implications for Recurrent Weight Gain, Dietary Quality, and Nutritional Outcomes - A Narrative Review.

Nida Yıldız, Şule Arslan, Halit Tanju Besler

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Obesity surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nida YıldızDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Istanbul Aydın University, Istanbul, Turkey. niday@aydin.edu.tr.
Şule ArslanDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Istanbul Aydın University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Halit Tanju BeslerDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Istanbul Aydın University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6523-7995

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultra-processed food (UPF) intake is increasingly linked to poor dietary quality, but its course after metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is unclear. This narrative review synthesized 12 observational reports (7 independent datasets) on postoperative UPF consumption and its associations with weight outcomes, dietary quality, and nutritional status. UPF intake fell early after surgery but rebounded from 12 to 24 months, approaching preoperative levels by year 5. Higher intake was associated with lower total weight loss, poorer dietary quality, and lower protein and micronutrient intake, whereas associations with recurrent weight gain were inconsistent and partly reflected total energy intake and processed foods. The evidence was limited and mostly cross-sectional. UPF consumption is a modifiable target for nutritional monitoring beyond the first 2 postoperative years.

Indexed as

Dietary qualityMetabolic and bariatric surgeryNOVA classificationRecurrent weight gainUltra-processed food

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.