Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42803903›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2026

The consequences of medicine shortages on healthcare utilization and care fragmentation.

Jan Panhuysen, Eva Goetjes, Mujaheed Shaikh, Katharina E Blankart

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jan Panhuysen *Hertie School, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5564-354X
Eva Goetjes *University of Duisburg-Essen, CINCH Health Economics Research Center, Berliner Platz 6-8, 45127, Essen, Germany. eva.goetjes@uni-due.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6390-3392
Mujaheed ShaikhHertie School, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4231-6631
Katharina E BlankartLeibniz Science Campus Ruhr, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9831-1787

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluate the consequences of medicine supply disruptions for healthcare utilization, care fragmentation, and costs. To provide causal evidence on such systemic effects, we examine the global recall of valsartan in July 2018, a widely used antihypertensive medicine. Drawing on German healthcare claims data covering 30,976 affected patients, we employ a difference-in-differences design with matched patients unaffected by supply disruptions. We find that nearly 70% of valsartan users discontinued medication but switched to other treatments, keeping the overall provision of antihypertensive care stable. Pharmaceutical costs rose, driven primarily by a 5.3% increase in costs for antihypertensives, imposing a significant financial burden on insurers. The recall temporarily increased general practitioner service utilization and care fragmentation, while pharmacy fragmentation persisted for up to a year, affecting one in five patients. Our quantification of hidden adjustment costs and burden-shifting effects in outpatient care underscores the need for pharmaceutical shortage management policies that recognize the temporary inefficiencies specifically introduced into medicine dispensing. Our findings generalize to other sudden supply disruptions and likely represent a benchmark of the consequences of medicine shortages.

Indexed as

Continuity of careDrug recallDrug shortagesPharmacy fragmentationSupply disruption

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.