Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42803860›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie2026

How Many Children in a Family? Fertility Ideals and Gender Equality Norms in 26 Societies.

Jonas Edlund, Ida Öun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonas EdlundUmeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Ida ÖunUmeå University, Umeå, Sweden. ida.oun@umu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examine the relationship between gender equality and fertility ideals, focusing on the role of societal norms about men's participation in care and household work, known as the second half of the gender revolution. We set out to capture how the prevalence of this revolution translates into fertility ideals on the societal level and among different social groups. Data come from the ISSP module 2012, covering 26 societies. The first objective is to examine the relationship between gender equality norms and fertility ideals across national contexts. The second objective is to compare how measures of gender equality focusing on the first half of the gender revolution, and the second half, respectively, are associated with fertility ideals. As previous research focusing on the first half of the gender revolution noted and/or predicted that actual or intended fertility tends to be comparatively lower among women, the highly educated, younger generations, and the non-religious, our third objective is to analyse the extent to which norms embracing the second half have the capacity to modify these relationships. The results show that norms about gender equality are positively related to fertility ideals and seem to influence patterns of fertility ideals among social groups. In societies with strong gender equality norms, women, the highly educated, and the young display comparatively higher fertility ideals. In societies with weak gender equality norms, these patterns are reversed. Differences depending on gender equality norm measures were small but systematically in favour of those capturing the second half of the gender revolution.

Indexed as

Fertility idealGender equalityGender revolutionInternational social survey programmeISSPNorms

Identifiers

PMID42803860
PMCPMC13620051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.