ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
ALK ATI in solid tumours: biological evidence, diagnostic challenges, and clinical relevance. a narrative review.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) can be activated in cancer through gene fusions, activating mutations, copy-number alterations, and abnormal transcription. ALK ATI is a truncated ALK transcript initiated from an alternative promoter within intron 19. It retains the intracellular kinase domain but lacks the extracellular and transmembrane regions of full-length ALK. The biological and clinical implications of this transcript remain unsettled. The discovery study reported ALK phosphorylation, oncogenic signalling, tumour formation, and crizotinib sensitivity in experimental models. Subsequent work described nuclear chromatin effects and cancer stem-cell phenotypes in selected models. However, independent experiments did not consistently reproduce growth-factor-independent transformation or sensitivity to ALK inhibitors, and melanoma models expressing ALK ATI generally showed low phosphorylation and no selective drug response. Clinical studies are retrospective, use heterogeneous assays, and report inconsistent prevalence and prognostic associations across melanoma, sarcoma, ovarian carcinoma, and histiocytic neoplasms. Importantly, ALK immunohistochemistry and break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization cannot establish ALK ATI: confirmation requires an RNA-based assay designed to demonstrate transcription from intron 19 into ALK exons 20-29, together with exclusion of a canonical ALK fusion. Current evidence therefore supports ALK ATI as a context-dependent biological phenomenon rather than a validated tumour-agnostic driver or predictive biomarker. ALK-inhibitor treatment should not be selected solely on the basis of ALK ATI outside a clinical trial or a carefully documented individual assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42803850What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.