ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Intraspinal extradural tumors].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical issueIntraspinal extradural lesions represent the most frequent group of spinal tumors and comprise a broad spectrum of primary and secondary neoplasms as well as intradural extramedullary tumors with secondary extradural extension. Because even small epidural lesions can cause significant neurological deficits through compression of the spinal cord or cauda equina, a prompt and accurate diagnosis is essential. RADIOLOGICAL STANDARD PROCEDURES: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the imaging modality of first choice as it enables a reliable assessment of the tumor extent, the relationship to the spinal cord, dural sac and nerve roots as well as possible bone marrow infiltration. Characteristic imaging features, such as the origin of the mass, dorsal cortical destruction, neural foraminal widening or a dumbbell-shaped growth pattern, often enable a targeted narrowing down of the underlying tumor entity. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: In adults secondary epidural tumors should be primarily considered in the differential diagnosis as they account for the majority of intraspinal extradural masses. In particular, metastases, plasma cell neoplasms and lymphomas are of high clinical relevance. A systematic assessment of the anatomical location, growth pattern and possible osseous alterations are essential to narrow down the differential diagnosis and to guide appropriate further diagnostic evaluation and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42803791What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.