Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42803764›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of medicine2026

Dose-conditioned machine-learning prediction of a composite target sedation state in patients undergoing propofol-sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Huiwen Zhang, Li Zhao, Wanji Yang, Bo Li, Wan Lin, Xiaoya Chen, Li Mo, Shangqi Dai, Wu Chen, Fan Yang and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Huiwen ZhangDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Li ZhaoDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Wanji YangDivision of Medical Emergency Response, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Health Commission, Yinchuan, China.
Bo LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Wan LinDepartment of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Xiaoya ChenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Li MoDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Shangqi DaiThe First Clinical Medical College, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Wu ChenThe First Clinical Medical College, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Fan YangDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Hanxiang MaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring propofol-sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy, adequate sedation must be achieved without compromising hemodynamic stability or oxygenation. We developed and temporally validated dose-conditioned machine-learning models to predict a composite target sedation state.

methodsThis single-center prospective observational study included 1,248 adults. The first 1,000 patients formed the development cohort and the subsequent 248 patients the temporal validation cohort. The composite outcome was assessed after MOAA/S-defined loss of consciousness and before endoscope insertion and required a bispectral index of 40-60, systolic blood pressure ≥80% of baseline, and peripheral oxygen saturation ≥90%. Five models were evaluated using routinely available variables collected before or during initial propofol administration, including the initial propofol dose.

resultsThe composite target was achieved in 153 patients (15.3%) in the development cohort and 33 (13.3%) in the validation cohort. Validation AUCs ranged from 0.780 to 0.821. Random Forest had the numerically highest AUC (0.821; 95% CI, 0.748-0.889), whereas ExtraTrees had the highest average precision (0.570; 95% CI, 0.388-0.724). Calibration was suboptimal across models. With only 33 validation events, confidence intervals were wide and comparisons among models remain uncertain.

conclusionsDose-conditioned machine-learning models showed moderate-to-good discrimination, but calibration remained suboptimal. No single model was uniformly superior. Further recalibration and independent multicenter validation are needed before clinical use.

Indexed as

Endoscopy, GastrointestinalHypnotics and SedativesMachine LearningProcedural SedationPropofolAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsProspective StudiesRandom ForestHypnotics and SedativesPropofolcomposite target sedation stategastrointestinal endoscopymachine learningPropofoltemporal validation

Identifiers

PMID42803764
PMCPMC13629798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.