ArticlePsycho-oncology2026
From Mechanisms to Manifestations: A Scoping Review Exploring Cancer-Related Discrimination.
Article in Psycho-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis scoping review examines the available qualitative evidence from systematic and scoping reviews, and mixed-methods or qualitative studies on cancer-related discrimination.
methodsCancer-related discrimination was defined as direct and recurring experiences of enacted stigma, behaviours, or unfair treatment based on an individual's cancer history, current cancer diagnosis, perceived cancer risk, or cancer caregiving role. A systematic search of ProQuest databases, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, APA PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and Web of Science identified peer-reviewed research published before December 13, 2025. Two independent reviewers screened studies, and data were narratively synthesised using the Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework (i.e., drivers and system-level facilitators; discrimination experiences; impacts).
resultsIn total, 116 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 83 qualitative studies, 23 mixed-method, nine systematic reviews, and one scoping review. Cancer-related discrimination was reported across four contexts: (1) familial and social; (2) hiring and workplace; (3) insurance and welfare; and (4) healthcare. Discrimination drivers included misconceptions that cancer is contagious, employer concerns about productivity and costs, rigid welfare regulations, and reduced public empathy for cancers perceived as 'self-inflicted'. Reported experiences ranged from social exclusion and bullying, to workplace dismissals, job rejections, and barriers to insurance or financial support. In healthcare contexts, provider blame, judgement, and strained patient-clinician interactions were reported. Impacts of discrimination included self-isolation, concealment of diagnosis, internalised stigma, psychological distress, financial burden, and delayed treatment-seeking.
conclusionsCancer-related discrimination arises from cultural, institutional, and structural mechanisms, with significant impacts on quality of life and health. Coordinated policy, legal, institutional, and public education responses are required to address these challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.