ArticleJournal of vision2026
Lightness perception in augmented reality: Effects of context, background, motion, and disparity.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lightness constancy-the ability to form a stable percept of surface reflectance despite changes in illumination and context-is critical for the accurate interpretation of visual scenes, including virtual content in optical see-through augmented reality (OST-AR). However, the additive blending of virtual and real-world scenes in AR elevates the luminance of stimuli, which can make it difficult to create a convincing visual impression of low-reflectance surfaces. Here we investigated how a range of visual cues affects lightness perception in OST-AR, with the goal of identifying viewing conditions that expand the range of perceived reflectance for virtual stimuli. In two experiments, participants viewed virtual test patches in a foreground plane and rated their lightness relative to real patches on a paper reference palette. We manipulated four factors: the composition of surrounding elements in the foreground plane, the content and luminance of the background plane, the motion of the background plane, and the relative disparity between foreground and background. We found that the strongest effects on perceived reflectance came from changes to the foreground context: Isolating the test patch or eliminating luminance variation in the surrounding texture substantially reduced the range of perceived reflectance. Surprisingly, even large changes to the background, such as removing texture, introducing motion, or eliminating the depth disparity between foreground and background layers, had much smaller effects. These findings show that lightness perception in OST-AR depends heavily on how the foreground is structured and that including a rich foreground context can help virtual surfaces to generate a wide and realistic range of perceived reflectance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.