ArticleBriefings in functional genomics2026
Supervised clustering of bacterial promoter identifies two groups with different relevant positions at -10.
Article in Briefings in functional genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Promoters are DNA sequences responsible for the specific recognition of the transcriptional machinery in all the biological systems. In bacteria, two main groups of promoters have been described, the σ70-like family, which includes the housekeeping σ70 and the alternative σ38, σ32, σ28, and σ24; and the σ54 family. However, promoter sequences may differ even inside the same family, and this classification may not fully capture the functional diversity of groups. In this work, we explored and classified a collection of bacterial promoters associated with six σ factor families in the bacterium Escherichia coli K-12 using a Supervised clustering workflow that uses Shapley values. From this analysis, we identified two subgroups of sequences differentiated by the conservation of the -9 to -7 positions upstream the Transcription Start Site, suggesting that this region may be employed in classification frameworks. Finally, a detailed analysis of σ70 promoter sequences identify five clusters with a conserved signal in the -10, but with different sequence composition. In summary, these signatures could provide more insights into the sigma factor-promoter interaction and the separation of the DNA double-strand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.