ArticleThe plant genome2026
Improving grain yield prediction in Southern US oat germplasm using genomics information and environmental covariates.
Article in The plant genome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving grain yield prediction in Southern US oat germplasm using genomics information and environmental covariates.The plant genome · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic gains of oat (Avena sativa L.) grain yield have been historically low compared to other major cereal crops. The use of machine learning models to capture complex interactions and leveraging data types other than genomic information in prediction models has great potential for improving complex traits in oat breeding programs. This study assessed the performance of deep learning model for genomic prediction compared to other statistical models, examined the optimal training set size for grain yield prediction, and investigated the potential of incorporating environmental covariates for enhancing oat grain yield prediction. A total of 463 oat lines were evaluated in five environments in Southern United States, and genotyping of the lines gave 12,657 single-nucleotide polymorphism markers. Our results showed that training set sizes 200-350 could be the optimal size for our panel, indicating the possibility of reducing phenotyping costs by reducing the size of the oat panel tested. The deep learning model was less superior to genomic best linear unbiased prediction and other models for grain yield, test weight, and heading days in the different environments. Incorporating interaction effects (G × E or G × W) into the multikernel prediction models across environments improved predictive abilities for grain yield by up to 0.21 compared to the baseline models. This reveals the potential of incorporating weather data to enhance predictive abilities in genomic prediction models. Our findings provide important information for improving genetic gains in oat breeding programs by integrating genomics and environmental information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.