ArticleMedical care research and review : MCRR2026
Primary Care Physician Organization Affiliations With Health Systems Between 2014 and 2019 Were Associated With Modest Improvements in Quality of Care.
Article in Medical care research and review : MCRR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We examined whether affiliation of independent primary care physician organizations (POs) with vertically-integrated health systems improved quality of care or service utilization for Original Medicare enrollees overall and for groups of POs expected to benefit from affiliation. Using national Medicare claims, Provider Enrollment, Chain, and Ownership System (PECOS), and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 990 data from 2013 to 2019, we estimated changes in 13 quality and utilization measures following affiliation. We found that affiliation was not consistently associated with meaningful improvements in preventive care, chronic disease management, or utilization. Modest gains were observed in diabetic eye exams and organization-level care continuity, whereas primary care visits and specialist visits declined. Small POs exhibited additional gains in breast cancer screening relative to large POs, while low-quality POs and rural POs experienced lower relative performance on at least one other measure. These results suggest that health system affiliation alone does not yield broad improvements in quality across diverse types of primary care POs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.