Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42803145›Full record

ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2026

Outcomes of 'in-house' genetic testing within a specialist hereditary colorectal cancer registry.

Manasawee Srisuttayasathien, Victoria Cuthill, Menna Hawkins, Ashish Sinha, Susan Clark, Andrew Latchford, Kevin J Monahan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manasawee SrisuttayasathienThe St Mark's Centre for Familial Intestinal Cancer, St Mark's: The National Bowel Hospital, Central Middlesex Hospital Site, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0403-2611
Victoria CuthillThe St Mark's Centre for Familial Intestinal Cancer, St Mark's: The National Bowel Hospital, Central Middlesex Hospital Site, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8939-3312
Menna HawkinsThe St Mark's Centre for Familial Intestinal Cancer, St Mark's: The National Bowel Hospital, Central Middlesex Hospital Site, London, UK.
Ashish SinhaThe St Mark's Centre for Familial Intestinal Cancer, St Mark's: The National Bowel Hospital, Central Middlesex Hospital Site, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9384-2482
Susan ClarkThe St Mark's Centre for Familial Intestinal Cancer, St Mark's: The National Bowel Hospital, Central Middlesex Hospital Site, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6929-8082
Andrew LatchfordThe St Mark's Centre for Familial Intestinal Cancer, St Mark's: The National Bowel Hospital, Central Middlesex Hospital Site, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8626-188X
Kevin J MonahanThe St Mark's Centre for Familial Intestinal Cancer, St Mark's: The National Bowel Hospital, Central Middlesex Hospital Site, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7918-4003

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsApproximately 5%-10% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases are due to known Mendelian syndromes. This study aimed to report the diagnostic yield of constitutional genetic testing, alongside clinicopathological factors for hereditary CRC, within a specialised National Bowel Hospital, and outside traditional genetics referral pathways.

methodThis study retrospectively reviewed clinical, pathological and genetic factors using prospectively collected data from the St Mark's Hospital Centre for Familial Intestinal Cancer registry. Between December 2021 and June 2023, consecutive patients at risk of hereditary CRC were selected for genetic testing according to UK National Genomic Testing criteria. The diagnostic yield of genetic testing was calculated by indication. Statistical analysis for clinicopathological data was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test and logistic regression.

resultsA total of 283 consecutive patients underwent genetic testing, 100 (35.3%) mainstreamed with CRC, 95 (33.6%) with multiple polyps, 74 (26.6%) had cascade testing (within families where the probands were known to the registry) and other testing including 'unaffected' patients with a relevant family history. Variants were detected in 85 of 283 (30%) patients with known CRC predisposition genes. Diagnostic yields were high for deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) cancer with Lynch syndrome (LS) at 45%, and also for multiple adenoma cohorts at 16%; and in CRC patients under 40 years (irrespective of tumour MMR status) at 16%.

conclusionGenetic testing performed by our specialist unit provides patients with a high-yield, and effective genetic diagnosis, directly indicating comprehensive lifelong care, outside the context of a traditional genetics service.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsGenetic TestingAdultAgedColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRetrospective StudiesUnited Kingdomhereditary colorectal cancerLynch syndromemismatch repair deficiencypolyposis

Identifiers

PMID42803145
PMCPMC13617510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.