Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42802979›Full record

ArticleVeterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association2026

Agreement of Multimodal Large Language Models and Novice Readers With Expert-Based Radiographic Scoring of Presumptive Septic Carpal Arthritis in Calves.

Ayşe Gölgeli Bedir, Esra Modoğlu, Tuğçe Kartal, Büşra Kibar, Mümin Gökhan Şenocak, Ömer Tarık Orhun, Ferda Turgut, Uğur Ersöz, Yakup Kocaman, Yasemin Akçora and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ayşe Gölgeli BedirDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9798-8638
Esra ModoğluDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0506-8999
Tuğçe KartalDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8394-003X
Büşra KibarDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1490-8832
Mümin Gökhan ŞenocakDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8855-8847
Ömer Tarık OrhunDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4184-8879
Ferda TurgutDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2956-7548
Uğur ErsözDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1687-2327
Yakup KocamanDepartment of Veterinary Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3580-7782
Yasemin AkçoraDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6104-8393
Sıtkıcan OkurDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2620-897X
Latif Emrah YanmazDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5890-8271

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Septic arthritis is an important cause of morbidity in calves, and radiographic interpretation may vary between observers, especially when structured scoring systems are used by less experienced readers. This single-center retrospective reader study evaluated whether general-purpose multimodal large language models (LLMs) could support rubric-based radiographic scoring of presumptive septic carpal arthritis in calves. Fifty calves aged 0-3 months with clinical findings consistent with presumptive septic carpal arthritis were included, and one carpal radiograph per case was assessed. Two novice veterinary surgeons and three multimodal LLMs, ChatGPT-5, Gemini-2.5 Pro, and Claude Sonnet-4, independently scored each case using a Constant-based ordinal radiographic scoring framework. Expert consensus served as the operational reference standard. Agreement with the reference was assessed using exact agreement, agreement within one score category, and quadratic weighted kappa. Novice 1 showed the highest concordance, with a mean exact agreement of 55.6%, mean ±1 agreement of 89.8%, and substantial agreement (mean κ

Indexed as

Arthritis, InfectiousCarpal JointsCarpus, AnimalCattle DiseasesAnimalsCattleLarge Language ModelsObserver VariationRadiographyRetrospective Studiesartificial intelligencebovine imagingmusculoskeletal radiologyobserver agreementordinal scoring

Identifiers

PMID42802979
PMCPMC13617422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.