ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2026
Pathogenesis and Host Response to A3B4 and A3B2 Infectious Bursal Disease Virus Strains in Chickens.
Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pathogenesis and Host Response to A3B4 and A3B2 Infectious Bursal Disease Virus Strains in Chickens.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recently, the identification of novel reassortants of infectious bursal disease (IBD) virus (IBDV) was reported. Interestingly, these strains competed with the previously dominant A3B2 lineage, becoming the prevalent lineage in Poland and disseminating to other countries in Europe. However, the specific virulence properties that facilitate their spreading were not elucidated. In this study, we compared the pathogenesis of the A3B4 Bug/03 and A3B2 75/11 IBDV strains in specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chickens, integrating viral replication dynamics, tissue tropism, immunosuppressive effects and host transcriptional responses. Both strains replicated efficiently in lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues, with peak viral loads in the bursa of Fabricius. While the A3B2 75/11 strain exhibited higher viral RNA levels at early time points, the A3B4 Bug/03 strain persisted longer in multiple tissues. Notably, the A3B4 Bug/03 strain induced earlier bursal atrophy despite comparable viral loads at 4 dpi, and was associated with heterogeneous growth performance, reflecting uneven flock development. Transcriptomic analysis revealed distinct host response profiles between strains. Infection with the A3B4 virus was characterised by the enrichment of metabolic and translational pathways, indicating cellular adaptation and metabolic reprogramming. In contrast, the A3B2 75/11 strain triggered a strong activation of immune and inflammatory pathways, including cytokine and chemokine signalling. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that IBDV pathogenicity is not solely determined by viral replication, but is critically shaped by host response mechanisms. The ability of A3B4 strains to modulate host pathways and persist in infected birds likely contributes to their epidemiological success and facilitates their continued spread in poultry populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.