ArticleGlobal health action2026
Task shifting of point-of-care testing to lay health workers in rural primary health facilities in Nsanje, Malawi.
Article in Global health action, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPoint-of-care testing (POCT) can reduce diagnostic gaps, but because it frequently falls to overstretched frontline healthcare workers (HCW), its real-world effectiveness is diminished. Despite World Health Organization recommendations for task sharing (TS) with lay health workers (LHW), it remains underutilized.
objectiveTo explore whether task-shifted POCT by LHWs can improve uptake compared to standard HCW-led care.
methodsA retrospective study at 5 PHC facilities in Nsanje, Malawi, compared a pre-intervention (model 1) period where HCW conducted POCT (for rapid HIV, AHD, syphilis, hepatitis B and malaria), and post-intervention (model 2) where POCT was shifted to trained LHW. The primary outcome was the total number of POCT performed. The two-sample proportion test was used to assess differences in testing uptake in model 1 and 2.
resultsA total of 3,428 POC tests were conducted by LHWs in model 2 compared to 1,738 in model 1 (a near-2-fold increase). In both models, rapid HIV (38.9%), malaria (21.9%) and CD4 cell count (20.0%) tests were most common. The CD4 cell count testing had the highest incremental change in testing volume of 338% between models (from 192 to 840 tests;
conclusionsTS for POCT with LHW was feasible in rural PHC facilities and contributed to increased POCT volumes across multiple diseases, particularly for CD4 testing. As the range of POC tests expands, TS can improve uptake of diagnostics in these settings, but it must be accompanied by appropriate training and supportive oversight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.