Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42802883›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026

Mapping the readiness landscape for prostate cancer screening in Europe: analysis of health system capacity across the PRAISE-U pilots.

Sathishrajaa Palaniraja, Isabel Mosquera, Andre Lopes Carvalho, Deependra Singh, Josep Vilaseca, Aušvydas Patašius, Krzysztof Tupikowski, Ángel Gómez Amorín, Ana Marina Tarrazo Antelo, Montserrat Corujo Quinteiro and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06424275 (Prostate Cancer Awareness and Initiative for Screening in the European Union), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06424275 enrolling by invitationnot on this map

Prostate Cancer Awareness and Initiative for Screening in the European Union

TypeobservationalSponsorEuropean Association of Urology Research FoundationRan2024 to 2026Enrolled20,000ConditionsProstate CancerArmsRisk-based screening algorithm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Sathishrajaa PalanirajaEarly Detection, Prevention, and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Isabel MosqueraEarly Detection, Prevention, and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Andre Lopes CarvalhoEarly Detection, Prevention, and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Deependra SinghEarly Detection, Prevention, and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Josep VilasecaAlthaia, Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa, Manresa, Spain.
Aušvydas PatašiusInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Krzysztof TupikowskiLower Silesian Center for Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology, Wrocław, Poland.
Ángel Gómez AmorínService for population screening programmes, Ministry of Health, San Lázaro, Spain.
Ana Marina Tarrazo AnteloService for population screening programmes, Ministry of Health, San Lázaro, Spain.
Montserrat Corujo QuinteiroService for population screening programmes, Ministry of Health, San Lázaro, Spain.
David GalvinUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Roderick van den BerghDepartment of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Monique Joanne RoobolDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Lionne Dysette FrancellaVenderbosDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Sarah CollenEuropean Association of Urology, Policy Office, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Hendrik van PoppelEuropean Association of Urology, Policy Office, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Partha BasuEarly Detection, Prevention, and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Arunah ChandranEarly Detection, Prevention, and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
PRAISE-U consortiuml
PRAISE-U consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) remains the most frequently diagnosed cancer and a leading cause of cancer mortality among European men. To support the European Commission's call for organised, risk-stratified PCa screening, the PRAISE-U (PRostate cancer Awareness and Initiative for Screening in the European Union) pilots tested a designated pathway integrating prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, risk stratification and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy decisions. Methods: A formative readiness and capacity assessment was conducted across five PRAISE-U pilots in Lithuania, Lower Silesia (Poland), Manresa and Galicia (Spain), and Ireland. Data were triangulated from (1) desk reviews of legislation, screening policies, and relevant documentation; (2) facility-level assessments; and (3) multi-level stakeholder consultations collected between November 2023 and mid 2024. Finally 47 indicators across 11 domains were developed. Indicators were scored on a standardised 0-2 scale, aggregated at the domain level, and visualised using radar plots. The PRAISE-U was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT06424275. Findings: Substantial heterogeneity was observed across sites. Clinical domains (PSA testing availability, diagnostics, treatment, infection control, multidisciplinary teams and active surveillance protocols) scored high across all pilots. However, the programmatic "front-end" elements (awareness activities, eligibility identification, counselling Standard Operating Protocol) and "back-end" elements (systematic tracking of screen-positives, Quality Assurance and registry linkage) were noted weak and heterogeneous across sites. Lithuania demonstrated the highest overall readiness, while other pilots faced challenges in population identification, data governance, and structured follow-up of screen-positive individuals. Interpretation: While European pilot sites show robust clinical capacity for PCa care, substantial gaps remain in the organisational, data, and quality-assurance components, that warranted an effective population-based, risk-stratified PCa screening. Funding: This project has received funding from the EU4Health program under grant agreement 101101217, co-funded by the European Union.

Indexed as

Capacity assessmentHealth system readinessImplementation researchMRIPRAISE-UProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID42802883
PMCPMC13616564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.