SynthesisPeerJ2026
Prenatal allostatic load and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Allostatic load (AL) denotes the cumulative physiological dysregulation resulting from chronic stress exposure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between prenatal AL and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs), and to synthesize current evidence to inform prenatal health strategies and potentially reduce the incidence of APOs. Methodology: This study systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, VIP China Science and Technology Journal Database, and SinoMed databases for relevant studies examining prenatal AL and APOs published from September 1993 to 22 June 2026. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analysis was performed using R software (version 4.4.3). The study protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251076952). Results: Eight original studies involving 8,795 pregnant women were included. High prenatal AL was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (OR = 1.29, 95% CI [1.04-1.60]) and preeclampsia (OR = 2.31, 95% CI [1.42-3.76]). There was no statistically significant association with low birth weight (OR = 1.10, 95% CI [0.95-1.26]). Furthermore, exploratory subgroup analyses suggested that the gestational period and biomarker composition may influence these associations; however, high methodological heterogeneity limits direct clinical application. Conclusions: Elevated prenatal AL is associated with an increased risk of specific APOs, particularly preterm birth and preeclampsia. Future studies should adopt longitudinal designs with repeated AL measurements across pregnancy to clarify temporal dynamics and elucidate underlying biological mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.