ArticleCureus2026
Eczema Molluscatum in a Patient With Atopic Dermatitis on Upadacitinib and Methotrexate.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eczema molluscatum refers to widespread molluscum contagiosum (MC) infection occurring in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), a setting in which impaired skin barrier function and immune dysregulation both promote viral spread. We report the case of a 29-year-old man with longstanding, treatment-refractory AD who was well controlled on upadacitinib, a selective Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor, and methotrexate when he developed multiple pink, dome-shaped papules with central umbilication across the cheeks and forehead over a six-month period. The lesions were unresponsive to topical clindamycin-benzoyl peroxide gel. The differential diagnosis included eczema coxsackium, eczema herpeticum, eruptive syringomas, and a refractory JAK inhibitor-associated acneiform eruption, but the absence of pain, systemic symptoms, vesiculation, and follicular morphology supported a diagnosis of eczema molluscatum. The patient was treated with cryotherapy for each lesion, with marked improvement at one-month follow-up. AD itself is a recognized risk factor for MC, reflecting the disease's inherent Th2-skewed, barrier-disrupted immune environment. However, this case raises the possibility that systemic immunosuppression with JAK1 inhibitors, particularly in combination with methotrexate, may further impair type I interferon-mediated antiviral defense and compound susceptibility to MC in patients with AD. Nonetheless, clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for eczema molluscatum in patients with AD on JAK inhibitor therapy who develop new facial papules, as these lesions are readily mistaken for a JAK inhibitor-associated acneiform eruption, potentially delaying appropriate treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.