Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42802819›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Colorectal Carcinoma Metastatic to the Breast Mimicking Inflammatory Breast Cancer With Mismatch Repair Status Discordant From a Prior Endometrial Primary: A Case Report and a Review of the Literature.

Morgan L Walters, Andres Figueroa Quast

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Morgan L WaltersInternal Medicine, Mercy Hospital St. Louis, St. Louis, USA.
Andres Figueroa QuastInternal Medicine, Mercy Hospital St. Louis, St. Louis, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) metastatic to the breast is exceedingly rare, with 46 cases compiled in a 2019 literature review and additional isolated reports since. The diagnostic challenge is substantially amplified in patients with a prior breast cancer history, in whom new breast lesions are reflexively attributed to recurrence rather than extramammary metastasis. A 71-year-old woman with a significant family history of malignancy presented with invasive lobular carcinoma of the left breast, treated with lumpectomy and hormonal therapy. Four months later, she was diagnosed with stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus; immunohistochemistry of the hysterectomy specimen revealed isolated PMS2 loss with preserved MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 expression, and comprehensive germline testing of 35 hereditary cancer predisposition genes was negative, establishing a Lynch-like phenotype in that tumor. Approximately four years after her breast cancer diagnosis, she developed a maculopapular rash with skin thickening of the left breast, without a discrete mass; the clinical and mammographic presentation was concerning for inflammatory breast carcinoma. Punch biopsy demonstrated poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with signet ring cell features, immunohistochemically positive for SATB2, CDX2, CK20, and CEA and negative for CK7, ER, PR, HER2, and GATA3, confirming colorectal origin and excluding breast cancer recurrence. Mismatch repair immunohistochemistry on the same specimen demonstrated retained expression of all four proteins, discordant with the endometrial primary and concordant with microsatellite instability-stable status and a tumor mutational burden of 3.7 mutations/Mb. Next-generation sequencing identified a TP53 splice region loss-of-function variant with RAS and BRAF wild-type status. Positron emission tomography revealed stage IV disease with hepatic metastasis, and colonoscopy identified synchronous cecal and recto-sigmoid masses. She was treated with four lines of systemic therapy and palliative radiation to the breast, and died approximately 20 months after the metastatic diagnosis. This case illustrates two points. First, any new breast lesion in a patient with prior malignancy requires histopathologic confirmation with comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis, as neither recurrence nor a primary breast process can be assumed. Second, mismatch repair status is a property of the individual tumor rather than of the patient; in patients with multiple primaries, each tumor requires independent testing, and molecular findings from one cannot be extrapolated to another.

Indexed as

breast cancerextramammary breast massmetastatic colo-rectal cancerpms2uterine cancer

Identifiers

PMID42802819
PMCPMC13616508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.