Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42802816›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2026

Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Through 64 Weeks' Rimegepant Treatment for Migraine: Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial with Open-Label Extension.

Richard B Lipton, Dawn C Buse, Vincent T Martin, Dave Semel, Joseph C Cappelleri, Alexandra Thiry, Lucy Abraham, Terence Fullerton

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03732638 (A Phase 2/3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rimegepant in Migraine Prevention), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03732638 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 2/3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rimegepant in Migraine Prevention

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2018 to 2021Enrolled1,590ConditionsMigraineArmsRimegepant, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Richard B LiptonDepartment of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Dawn C BuseDepartment of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Vincent T MartinHeadache and Facial Pain Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Dave SemelMedical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.
Joseph C CappelleriDepartment of Statistics, Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9586-0748
Alexandra ThiryDepartment of Statistics, Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA.
Lucy AbrahamHealth Economics & Outcomes Research, Pfizer R&D UK Ltd, Tadworth, UK.
Terence FullertonMedical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The current exploratory analysis of a Phase 2/3 randomized controlled trial focusses on patient-reported outcome measures from a 64-week study evaluating rimegepant for the preventive treatment of migraine in the USA. Methods: Participants with migraine were randomly assigned to rimegepant 75 mg or placebo every other day during a 12-week double-blind treatment (DBT) phase. During a 52-week open-label extension (OLE) phase all participants took rimegepant 75 mg every other day and additionally on nonscheduled dosing days if needed. Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) v.2.1 (including Role Function Restrictive [RFR] domain) and Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) were assessed throughout. Results: 741 participants (mean [standard deviation] age 41.2 [13.06] years, 82.7% female) were treated with ≥1 dose of study drug in the DBT phase, and 603 participants were treated with rimegepant in the OLE phase. At Week 12 (end of DBT phase), for the rimegepant and placebo groups, respectively, mean (95% CI) improvements from baseline in MSQ RFR score were 18.6 (16.24, 20.94) and 15.0 (12.60, 17.37), and improvements in MIDAS Total score were -13.0 (-16.57, -9.52) and -12.0 (-15.52, -8.54). At Week 64 (end of OLE phase, all participants taking open-label rimegepant), for participants originally assigned DBT rimegepant and DBT placebo, respectively, mean (95% CI) improvements from baseline in MSQ RFR score were 32.6 (29.68, 35.42) and 33.2 (30.03, 36.29), and improvements from baseline in MIDAS Total Score were -25.4 (-30.23, -20.48) and -24.4 (-28.29, -20.59). Conclusion: Notable numerical benefit for rimegepant versus placebo was observed at the end of the DBT phase (Week 12) for MSQ RFR domain score. During open-label treatment with rimegepant, improvements from baseline in MSQ domain scores and MIDAS Total Score were clinically meaningful at Week 64. Participants who received placebo in the DBT phase achieved similar benefit when they moved into the OLE phase as those who took rimegepant from the start of the study. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03732638.

Indexed as

calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonistdisabilitymigrainequality of life

Identifiers

PMID42802816
PMCPMC13616162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.