ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
A Novel 3D-Printed Titanium Prosthesis with Osseointegrated Dental Implants for Reconstruction of Segmental Mandibular Defects.
Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Segmental mandibular defects present complex reconstructive challenges and are associated with significant functional and aesthetic morbidity. While vascularized bone flaps remain the standard for reconstruction, they are associated with donor-site morbidity, prolonged operative times, and limitations in predictable dental rehabilitation. This proof-of-concept study evaluated the mechanical feasibility, in a synthetic bench-top model, of a patient-specific, 3D-printed titanium mandibular prosthesis incorporating conventional dental implants for both dental rehabilitation and biological anchorage via osseointegration. Methods: The prosthesis was digitally designed and fabricated in Ti6Al4V-ELI titanium alloy by powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. A 25 mm critical-sized segmental defect was created in synthetic polyurethane mandible models, and prototype constructs were assembled with osteosynthesis screws and conventional dental implants engaging the residual mandible. Static load-to-failure testing was performed on a single prototype construct. Dynamic cyclic loading at 40-60 N and 2 Hz for 500,000 cycles was performed on three prototype constructs and a control reconstructed with a conventional 2.5 mm reconstruction plate under an identical protocol. Results: The prosthesis demonstrated accurate fit and reproducible assembly. Static testing resulted in failure at 213.9 N, occurring within the mandible model rather than in the prosthesis, fixation screws, or implant-prosthesis interface. All prototype constructs and the control completed 500,000 cycles without catastrophic failure, visible deformation, or loosening of fixation screws. The change in per-cycle displacement range over testing was small in all constructs and showed no progressive increase, indicating an absence of appreciable plastic deformation. Reverse torque testing demonstrated no implant loosening. Conclusion: This proof-of-concept study supports the mechanical feasibility of a novel 3D-printed titanium mandibular prosthesis under defined loading conditions in a synthetic bench-top model. Osseointegrated dental implants are intended to provide biological anchorage in addition to mechanical fixation, although osseointegration was not assessed in this model. This design concept warrants further translational investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.