ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2026
Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: From the Limitations of Therapeutic Hypothermia to Precision Intervention.
Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is the current standard of care for moderate-to-severe neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). However, its clinical application faces significant limitations, including a 44-55% rate of death or disability, a narrow 6‑h therapeutic window, inequitable global access, and inconsistent patient selection. These challenges highlight the need for emerging strategies that may complement or integrated with TH in the future. This review systematically synthesizes emerging therapeutic strategies beyond TH, encompassing four cutting-edge directions: first, targeting mitochondrial dysfunction and metabolic reprogramming; second, modulating neuroinflammation and immune responses; third, inhibiting programmed cell death pathways; and fourth, promoting neural repair and regeneration. We also discuss combination regimens, including sildenafil, resveratrol, and melatonin with magnesium, which have shown promise in preclinical or early clinical studies, while acknowledging that erythropoietin failed to show added benefit in Phase III trials. Importantly, most of the novel interventions discussed remain at preclinical or early‑phase clinical stages. To facilitate future translation, we systematically delineate the critical support infrastructure for HIE management in the precision medicine era: multimodal biomarkers and risk stratification, including neuroimaging, neuroelectrophysiology, fluid biomarkers, and clinical risk scoring models. By integrating these tools, it will be possible to rapidly identify the dominant injury pathway in each infant within the "golden 6-hour" window, implement individualized combination interventions, and promptly deploy neurorestorative strategies during the subacute phase. Realizing this vision will require global collaboration, standardized data sharing, and low-cost interventions tailored for LMICs. In conclusion, while precision medicine holds great promise for HIE, it is not yet an established replacement for therapeutic hypothermia; rather, it represents a scientifically rational and evolving strategy that requires rigorous clinical validation to improve long‑term outcomes for affected neonates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.