ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2026
Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns and Stewardship Opportunities in Pediatric Facial Trauma: A Five-Year Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess antibiotic prescribing practices in pediatric facial trauma at a tertiary academic center, examine their association with infection outcomes, and identify stewardship opportunities to inform future larger-scale evaluation of antibiotic use in pediatric facial fractures. Methods: This retrospective chart review included pediatric patients (< 18 years) presenting via trauma activation with facial trauma to a tertiary academic medical system over 5 years. Patients were identified through the institutional data warehouse. Data collected included demographics, injury patterns, antibiotic prescribing details (route, duration, timing), surgical interventions, and clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was infection development; secondary outcomes included antibiotic-related complications. Descriptive statistics characterized prescribing patterns, and univariate tests evaluated associations between antibiotic use and outcomes. Multivariable modeling was not performed due to only two infection events. Statistical significance was set at Results: Among 223 pediatric patients with facial fractures, the infection rate was low (< 1%). Despite this, 46.2% received antibiotics, though only 32.3% received systemic therapy. Among treated patients, 68.9% received courses exceeding 5 days (median 8 days), and over 70% received intravenous antibiotics. Surgical intervention was most strongly associated with antibiotic use, with surgical patients receiving antibiotics significantly more often than non-surgical patients. Open fractures were associated with higher utilization and longer durations compared with closed fractures. Both documented infections occurred in antibiotic recipients, though this association was not statistically significant. Notably, 51% of antibiotic recipients were candidates for shorter courses or oral conversion. Conclusion: These findings suggest potential antibiotic overutilization and highlight substantial opportunities to optimize stewardship in pediatric facial trauma, including limiting prophylactic duration, favoring oral therapy when appropriate, and better targeting antibiotics to high-risk patients. Prospective, multicenter studies are needed to guide evidence-based guideline development. Level of Evidence: Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.