ArticleCureus2026
Isolated Lip Angioedema Associated With Spironolactone: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spironolactone is a widely used mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist with a well-established adverse-effect profile; however, angioedema is uncommon and a poorly recognized adverse reaction. We report a case of suspected isolated lip angioedema associated with spironolactone therapy in a 74-year-old woman. The patient presented with a two-week history of persistent upper-lip swelling and facial heaviness without urticaria, pruritus, tongue or oropharyngeal involvement, or symptoms of airway compromise. Although spironolactone had been prescribed approximately one year earlier, the patient had been poorly adherent and had resumed consistent daily use approximately one month before the onset of symptoms. She continued spironolactone despite the development of swelling. Clinical evaluation and laboratory investigations did not identify an alternative cause, and serum complement C4 was within the normal range. C1-esterase inhibitor antigenic and functional assays were unavailable. Spironolactone was discontinued, resulting in substantial improvement by Day 7 and complete resolution by Day 14 without recurrence. The Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale yielded a score of 6, consistent with a probable adverse drug reaction. This case highlights isolated lip angioedema as a potential, although rare, adverse reaction to spironolactone and underscores the importance of establishing actual medication exposure when assessing suspected drug-related reactions. Recognition of uncommon medication triggers may facilitate timely withdrawal of the offending agent and prevent potentially more severe recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.