Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42802681›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing management2026

Couple-Level Coping and Hope Interdependence in Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolisation: Insights From an Actor-Partner Interdependence Model.

Yu Wei, Xiaofang Long, Ying Yin, Yan Li, Lei Sun, Ailing Hu, Yuan Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yu WeiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery & Division of Vascular Interventional Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong, China, zssy.com.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6383-5733
Xiaofang LongDepartment of Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong, China, zssy.com.cn.
Ying YinDepartment of Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong, China, zssy.com.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4414-2868
Yan LiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery & Division of Vascular Interventional Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong, China, zssy.com.cn.
Lei SunDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery & Division of Vascular Interventional Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong, China, zssy.com.cn.
Ailing HuNursing Teaching & Research Office, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong, China, zssy.com.cn.
Yuan LiuNursing Department, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510655, Guangdong, China, sysu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4299-4771

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) are physically demanding for patients and their caregivers, as well as psychologically stressful. Spouses are often the main informal caregivers, so illness-related stress after TACE is experienced by the couple. Hope can provide psychological support for people with cancer, and dyadic coping refers to how couples cope with the stress of illness through communication. However, evidence remains limited regarding actor and partner associations between hope and dyadic coping in HCC patient-spouse dyads after TACE.

aimTo examine the actor and partner associations between hope and dyadic coping in HCC patient-spouse dyads after TACE using the actor-partner interdependence model (APIM).

methodsThis cross-sectional study included 177 patient-spouse dyads recruited from a tertiary hospital in China between October 2023 and June 2024. Participants completed questionnaires on hope and dyadic coping. Data were analysed using SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 24.0. Distinguishable dyads were specified in the APIM, controlling for patient age, Child-Pugh grade, and number of TACE sessions.

resultsBoth patients and their spouses reported moderate dyadic coping and relatively high hope. Hope was positively correlated with dyadic coping within and between partners. APIM revealed significant actor associations, indicating that higher hope was associated with better individual dyadic coping in patients (B' = 0.289, 95% CI [0.109, 0.451], p < 0.001) and spouses (B' = 0.381, 95% CI [0.221, 0.521], p < 0.001). Significant partner associations were also observed from patients to spouses (B' = 0.160, 95% CI [0.001, 0.308], p < 0.05) and from spouses to patients (B' = 0.181, 95% CI [0.031, 0.322], p < 0.05). These findings suggest that hope is associated with dyadic coping in both patients and spouses, underscoring the interdependent nature of psychological adjustment among couples managing HCC after TACE.

conclusionsHope was associated with dyadic coping in both patients and spouses, highlighting the interdependent nature of psychological adjustment in couples coping with HCC after TACE. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nurse managers should recognise HCC patient-spouse dyads as an interdependent unit and incorporate assessment of both partners' hope and dyadic coping into oncology care management.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalCarcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticHopeLiver NeoplasmsSpousesAdultAgedChinaCoping SkillsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesactor–partner interdependence modeldyadic copinghepatocellular carcinomahopespousestranscatheter arterial chemoembolisation

Identifiers

PMID42802681
PMCPMC13617309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.