ArticleInternational wound journal2026
A Prospective Cohort Study of Hard-to-Heal Chronic Foot and Leg Wounds Followed for up to 20 Weeks After Initiation of ReGenerating Tissue Agents (RGTA) Technology as an Add-on to Optimal Local Care.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
ReGenerating Tissue Agents (RGTA, trade name CACIPLIQ20) contain a structural analogue of heparan sulfates (HSs) that promotes tissue regeneration in hard-to-heal chronic wounds resistant to the best standard of care for 6 months or longer. The MATHCOW study aimed to evaluate the real-life performance and safety of RGTA administered in addition to optimal treatment in diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), venous leg ulcers (VLUs), and leg ulcers with an ischemic component (arterial ulcers). The primary outcome measure was the rate of ulcer closure within the first 20 weeks of treatment. A total of 191 patients were recruited; 173 signed informed consent and constituted the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis set. The per-protocol (PP) population included 114 patients. The primary endpoint was 50 wound closures at 20 weeks in the ITT analysis (28.9%) and 46 wound closures in the PP analysis (40.4%). Closure rates varied according to ulcer type: 43.7% for VLUs, 46.2% for DFUs, and 14.6% for arterial ulcers. Other endpoints also improved, including clinician global impression, pain, and ulcer area. Adverse events were recorded in 4% of cases. This open-label study confirms the performance and tolerability of RGTA in a population of patients with particularly hard-to-heal chronic ulcers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.