Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42802486›Full record

ArticleHLA2026

Apparentness of Unseen Rejection Episodes Post Lung rLTx Is Reliably Enabled by ddcfDNA Detection.

Aleksandra Gazikalovic, Christina Bade-Döding, Murielle Verboom, Susann Zirzow, Michael Hallensleben, Rainer Blasczyk, Jens Gottlieb, Funmilola Josephine Haukamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HLA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aleksandra GazikalovicInstitute of Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Engineering, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4470-0140
Christina Bade-DödingInstitute of Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Engineering, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Murielle VerboomInstitute of Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Engineering, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8260-2045
Susann ZirzowInstitute of Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Engineering, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Michael HallenslebenInstitute of Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Engineering, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7555-218X
Rainer BlasczykInstitute of Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Engineering, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3875-3190
Jens GottliebDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9540-9022
Funmilola Josephine HaukampInstitute of Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Engineering, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4076-821X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ddcfDNA emerged as a biomarker for post-transplantation management strategies. Lung retransplant recipients represent a particularly vulnerable patient population with an increased risk of allograft injury. The demand for understanding if ddcfDNA levels differ between primary lung transplant recipients and lung retransplant recipients becomes obvious. Eight lung retransplant recipients and 50 primary lung transplant recipients with comparable HLA Class I and Class II mismatch scores were included in this retrospective study. During post-transplant monitoring, ddcfDNA results were evaluated alongside data on patient humoral immune responses pre- and post-transplantation. Antibody profiles of lung retransplant recipients did not differ significantly from those of their primary transplant comparisons. However, significantly higher ddcfDNA levels were observed in the retransplant cohort (median: 1.463%, IQR: 0.810-2.745) compared with primary transplant cohort (median: 0.550%, IQR: 0.338-0.935), U = 100.50, Z = -2.24, p = 0.012, r = 0.29. We identified that lung retransplant recipients exhibit increased allograft injury not solely attributable to humoral responses. Our study highlights that these patients face a higher immunological risk and supports the need for closer clinical follow-up using a resilient biomarker such as ddcfDNA. Incorporating ddcfDNA as a surrogate marker into post-transplant monitoring would provide early and unambiguous insights into allograft rejection, enabling prompt interventions to prevent unfavourable outcomes in this particularly fragile patient group.

Indexed as

Graft RejectionLung TransplantationAdultBiomarkersFemaleHumansImmunity, HumoralMaleMiddle AgedReoperationRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersallograft injurycellular responseddcfDNADSAhumoral responseliquid biopsylung transplantationretransplantation

Identifiers

PMID42802486
PMCPMC13617177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.