ArticleHLA2026
Apparentness of Unseen Rejection Episodes Post Lung rLTx Is Reliably Enabled by ddcfDNA Detection.
Article in HLA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ddcfDNA emerged as a biomarker for post-transplantation management strategies. Lung retransplant recipients represent a particularly vulnerable patient population with an increased risk of allograft injury. The demand for understanding if ddcfDNA levels differ between primary lung transplant recipients and lung retransplant recipients becomes obvious. Eight lung retransplant recipients and 50 primary lung transplant recipients with comparable HLA Class I and Class II mismatch scores were included in this retrospective study. During post-transplant monitoring, ddcfDNA results were evaluated alongside data on patient humoral immune responses pre- and post-transplantation. Antibody profiles of lung retransplant recipients did not differ significantly from those of their primary transplant comparisons. However, significantly higher ddcfDNA levels were observed in the retransplant cohort (median: 1.463%, IQR: 0.810-2.745) compared with primary transplant cohort (median: 0.550%, IQR: 0.338-0.935), U = 100.50, Z = -2.24, p = 0.012, r = 0.29. We identified that lung retransplant recipients exhibit increased allograft injury not solely attributable to humoral responses. Our study highlights that these patients face a higher immunological risk and supports the need for closer clinical follow-up using a resilient biomarker such as ddcfDNA. Incorporating ddcfDNA as a surrogate marker into post-transplant monitoring would provide early and unambiguous insights into allograft rejection, enabling prompt interventions to prevent unfavourable outcomes in this particularly fragile patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.