ReviewImmunological reviews2026
Discovery of Post-Translationally Modified Epitopes in Autoimmunity: Someone Has to Fish so Everyone Can Eat.
Review in Immunological reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) chemically diversify the ~20,000 genomically encoded proteins into millions of functional variants, and this diversity has profound consequences for T cell-mediated immune responses. PTM-reactive T cells have been identified across numerous autoimmune diseases and, in several cases, implicated directly as pathogenic drivers. Mechanistically, PTMs promote autoimmunity through two intertwined routes: by altering peptide-MHC and TCR binding to favor recognition of self-epitopes, and by generating neoepitopes in peripheral and/or inflamed tissues that are absent from the thymus, allowing PTM-reactive T cells to escape central tolerance. This cascade is amplified by inflammatory cytokines, upregulated antigen-processing machinery, disease-associated HLA alleles, and, in some cases, exogenous triggers such as diet. We use three well-characterized examples-citrullination in multiple autoimmune disorders, hybrid insulin peptide (HIP) formation in type 1 diabetes, and gluten deamidation in celiac disease-to illustrate how distinct PTM biology, tissue specificity, and genetic encodability shape the antigenic landscape and dictate feasible discovery strategies. We then review four complementary approaches for identifying PTM-specific T cell responses: mass spectrometry-based proteomics and immunopeptidomics, computational MHC-binding prediction, antigen-directed methods, and high-throughput T cell receptor (TCR)-directed library screening methods. For each, we discuss underlying principles, strengths, and limitations, with particular attention to the challenge posed by non-canonical, PTM-bearing residues. By comparing citrullination, HIPs, and gluten deamidation across these methodologies, we highlight how biochemical alterations, tissue accessibility, and mouse-to-human conservation determine which discovery approach is most tractable. We conclude that while synthetic peptide-based methods remain the standard for validating known epitopes, emerging high-throughput, cell-based platforms are rapidly expanding the accessibility of the PTM antigenic landscape for both known and undiscovered autoimmune epitopes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.