Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42802290›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2026

Validity of Bone Mineral Density Measurements Using SONIALVISION G4: A Quantitative CT-based Evaluation.

Junichiro Morita, Keisuke Uemura, Sotaro Kono, Yi Gu, Yuto Nishioka, Tomoki Asano, Ryo Higuchi, Hirokazu Mae, Makoto Iwasa, Tetsuro Tani and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Junichiro MoritaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Mito Medical Center, Ibarakimachi, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9928-1636
Keisuke UemuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Medical Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan. surmountjp@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9245-1743
Sotaro KonoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8393-2781
Yi GuDivision of Information Science, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6454-788X
Yuto NishiokaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9016-8949
Tomoki AsanoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0253-6034
Ryo HiguchiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-6766-8696
Hirokazu MaeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4617-0409
Makoto IwasaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka Medical Center, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5959-3507
Tetsuro TaniDepartment of Orthopaedic Medical Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7855-8037
Kazuma TakashimaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4376-8075
Kazunori TamuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyowakai Hospital, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6045-5945
Takeshi OgawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7669-4868
Wataru AndoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9352-465X
Takeshi OgawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Mito Medical Center, Ibarakimachi, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7261-6603
Yoshito OtakeDivision of Information Science, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1291-9316
Seiji OkadaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5107-8209
Hidetoshi HamadaDepartment of Orthopaedic Medical Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3652-9400

Funding

Japanese Orthopaedic Association 2023-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSONIALVISION G4 is a fluoroscopic imaging system equipped with a bone densitometry function calibrated against GE Healthcare dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements. However, evidence supporting the validity of in vivo bone mineral density (BMD) measurements remains limited. This study compared BMD measurements obtained using SONIALVISION G4 with GE DXA reference data and evaluated their validity using quantitative computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 887 BMD examinations performed with SONIALVISION G4 in women aged ≥45 years were compared with published Japanese reference data obtained using GE DXA. CT-derived BMD was quantified using a validated deep learning-based method and compared with measurements obtained using SONIALVISION G4 in 30 patients. To validate the CT method against GE DXA, 697 patients from four additional institutions underwent GE DXA and CT. Analyses were conducted for both the femoral neck and total hip.

resultsFemoral neck BMD generally showed small differences from the reference values, whereas total hip BMD was consistently higher in women aged ≥55 years. CT-derived BMD correlated with SONIALVISION G4 measurements (r = 0.762 and 0.842 for the femoral neck and total hip, respectively), with median absolute differences of 0.022 and 0.133 g/cm

conclusionSONIALVISION G4 showed small differences in femoral neck BMD measurements compared with CT-derived measurements but may systematically overestimate total hip BMD. Further validation studies are warranted.

Indexed as

CalibrationDual-energy X-ray absorptiometryOsteoporosisQuantitative computed tomography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.