ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2026
Validity of Bone Mineral Density Measurements Using SONIALVISION G4: A Quantitative CT-based Evaluation.
Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSONIALVISION G4 is a fluoroscopic imaging system equipped with a bone densitometry function calibrated against GE Healthcare dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements. However, evidence supporting the validity of in vivo bone mineral density (BMD) measurements remains limited. This study compared BMD measurements obtained using SONIALVISION G4 with GE DXA reference data and evaluated their validity using quantitative computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 887 BMD examinations performed with SONIALVISION G4 in women aged ≥45 years were compared with published Japanese reference data obtained using GE DXA. CT-derived BMD was quantified using a validated deep learning-based method and compared with measurements obtained using SONIALVISION G4 in 30 patients. To validate the CT method against GE DXA, 697 patients from four additional institutions underwent GE DXA and CT. Analyses were conducted for both the femoral neck and total hip.
resultsFemoral neck BMD generally showed small differences from the reference values, whereas total hip BMD was consistently higher in women aged ≥55 years. CT-derived BMD correlated with SONIALVISION G4 measurements (r = 0.762 and 0.842 for the femoral neck and total hip, respectively), with median absolute differences of 0.022 and 0.133 g/cm
conclusionSONIALVISION G4 showed small differences in femoral neck BMD measurements compared with CT-derived measurements but may systematically overestimate total hip BMD. Further validation studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42802290What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.