ArticleNature communications2026
Towards density-optimal DNA storage with practical bijective coding.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Towards density-optimal DNA storage with practical bijective coding.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA storage is a promising solution to data explosion due to its high density and longevity. However, existing coding methods struggle to efficiently avoid error-prone sequences while retaining usable ones, leading to low density and high copy numbers. Here we show Siyuan Code, a DNA storage codec that achieves theoretically optimal density. Our method maps binary data to nearly all suitable low-error sequences in a one-to-one manner, using our data structure to catalog and avoid error-prone patterns. This allows operation under very strict biochemical constraints with minimal redundancy. Experiments demonstrate a storage density of 1.66 bits per nucleotide and a capacity of 41 exabytes per gram of DNA, with perfect data retrieval using only six copies per strand. Encoding and decoding speeds reach approximately 1 megabyte per second on commodity hardware, comparable to early USB flash drives. These results bring DNA storage closer to practical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.