ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Introducing FRAM as a tool for surgical process modeling: a case study for understanding surgical scheduling complexity.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSurgical processes are inherently variable leading to unexpected delays and cancellations. Due to inefficient and outdated processes, there is a need to understand and improve potential bottlenecks. However, traditional surgical process models (SPMs) focus on intraoperative procedures and sequential workflows, but most cannot adequately capture parallel workflows, variability, and sociotechnical interactions. We propose the use of Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) in conjunction with FRAMalyse to enable systematic measurement of variability propagation and potential process bottleneck identification. Additionally, we introduce a structured FRAM Model Interpreter (FMI) cycle-mapping interpretation protocol that maps function activations across cycles to temporal process phases, an approach for interpreting FRAM simulation outputs that has not been used in prior qualitative applications of the method. MATERIAL AND
methodsBased on stakeholder interviews and workflow observations, we developed a FRAM model of the daily surgical scheduling process at University Hospital Technical University of Munich (TUM). FMI profiles for each function were determined based on expert interviews and function activations were recorded during model simulation. Additionally, the model was analyzed using FRAMalyse to identify functions with high variability potential arising from their coupling structure, thereby providing a basis for future bottleneck validation and surgical scheduling optimization.
resultsWe identified 98 interconnected FRAM functions across four agents and phases. Scheduling and rescheduling functions spanned multiple cycles, indicating continuous and reciprocal coordination. Surgical team allocation function showed the highest variability, while attending surgeons performed the most functions and central patient management (CPM) had the highest coupling density.
conclusionThis study introduces the first quantitative application of FRAM and FRAMalyse in the healthcare domain, systematically identifying candidate bottlenecks across the full surgical scheduling pathway as a foundation for process improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42802259What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.