Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42802219›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026

Identification of patient subgroups by hierarchical cluster analysis in femoral neck fractures and surgical outcome analysis.

Enver Ipek, Yusuf Altuntaş, Bahadır Balkanlı, Mehmet Ali Bozca, Hüseyin Unutmaz, İsmail Demirkale, Osman Tuğrul Eren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Enver IpekŞişli Etfal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6205-1207
Yusuf AltuntaşŞişli Etfal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8561-7736
Bahadır BalkanlıŞişli Etfal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4501-9090
Mehmet Ali BozcaBakırköy Dr.Sadi Konuk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9908-0503
Hüseyin UnutmazŞişli Etfal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey.
İsmail DemirkaleLiv Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Osman Tuğrul ErenSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey. osmantugrul.eren@sbu.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFemoral neck fractures are a heterogeneous entity with wide variability in patient profiles and outcomes. Single-variable classification may not capture the multidimensional interactions that influence prognosis. This study aimed to identify clinically meaningful patient subgroups using hierarchical cluster analysis and to compare mortality, postoperative mobility, and complication rates between these subgroups. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 672 patients treated for intracapsular femoral neck fractures classified as AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 31-B between 2009 and 2023, including 586 who underwent hemiarthroplasty (HA) and 86 who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was performed using the Gower distance matrix and Ward's D2 linkage method based on 20 preoperative and intraoperative clinical and surgical variables, excluding outcome measures. The optimal number of clusters was determined by silhouette analysis. Mortality predictors were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression, and predictors of good postoperative mobility were evaluated by binary logistic regression.

resultsTwo distinct clinical phenotypes were identified: a high-risk cluster (n = 607; mean age 78.3 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] physical status III 86.2%, HA 96.4%, dementia 14.8%) and a low-risk cluster (n = 65; mean age 63.4 years, ASA II 81.5%, THA 98.5%, dementia 0%). Cox regression identified age (p < 0.001), male sex (p < 0.001), dementia (p = 0.029), ASA score (p = 0.010), and red-cell distribution width coefficient of variation (RDW-CV; p = 0.011) as independent mortality predictors, whereas procedure type was not significant (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.659, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.427-1.015, p = 0.058). In contrast, procedure type was independently associated with good postoperative mobility (odds ratio [OR] = 3.944, 95% CI: 1.516-10.260, p = 0.005).

conclusionsHierarchical cluster analysis identified two clinically distinct patient phenotypes with significantly different outcomes. Procedure type did not independently predict mortality, whereas THA was independently associated with good postoperative mobility, suggesting that the apparent survival advantage of THA may largely reflect indication-based selection bias. These findings support individualised, multidimensional risk assessment rather than single-variable decision-making. Because the identified phenotypes incorporate intraoperative variables, they characterise prognosis rather than guiding preoperative arthroplasty selection.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipFemoral Neck FracturesHemiarthroplastyAgedAged, 80 and overCluster AnalysisClustering AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsProximal Femoral FracturesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeArthroplastyComorbidityMortalityPatient PhenotypingTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID42802219
PMCPMC13616867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.